public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/95102] New: missed if-conversion
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 08:58:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-95102-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95102
Bug ID: 95102
Summary: missed if-conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
If you rewrite gcc.target/i386/pr54855-9.c to a form GIMPLE looks like after
some PRE you end up with
typedef float vec __attribute__((vector_size(16)));
vec
foo (vec x, float a)
{
if (!(x[0] < a))
x[0] = a;
return x;
}
which is no longer recognized as the same and emits
foo:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
comiss %xmm0, %xmm1
ja .L2
movss %xmm1, %xmm0
.L2:
ret
instead of
foo:
.LFB1:
.cfi_startproc
minss %xmm1, %xmm0
ret
this is because RTL if-conversion does not recognize
7: r86:SF=vec_select(r84:V4SF,parallel)
8: flags:CCFP=cmp(r85:SF,r86:SF)
REG_DEAD r86:SF
9: pc={(flags:CCFP>0)?L14:pc}
REG_DEAD flags:CCFP
REG_BR_PROB 536870916
10: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 3
12: r84:V4SF=vec_merge(vec_duplicate(r85:SF),r84:V4SF,0x1)
REG_DEAD r85:SF
14: L14:
15: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 4
20: xmm0:V4SF=r84:V4SF
the form it does recognize is
8: r82:SF=vec_select(r84:V4SF,parallel)
9: flags:CCFP=cmp(r85:SF,r82:SF)
10: pc={(flags:CCFP>0)?L28:pc}
REG_DEAD flags:CCFP
REG_BR_PROB 536870916
28: L28:
14: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 3
5: r85:SF=r82:SF
REG_DEAD r82:SF
15: L15:
16: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 4
18: r87:V4SF=vec_merge(vec_duplicate(r85:SF),r84:V4SF,0x1)
next reply other threads:[~2020-05-13 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-13 8:58 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-05-13 9:11 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/95102] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-20 1:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-20 1:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-20 7:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-95102-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).