From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 37FC13887013; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 10:07:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 37FC13887013 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1592129241; bh=W7S6+kn12bLWIPTRO4Cj8y0yPBoH5JdUk1hZGAVFL+g=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=I132bMyXE+RR3RmRCUQPVaAbAcZTZrgApiiBkIrTkWkWxDxmaMC25kAxZNKkJY01x s+u1slswTWujy6jmpbA9GcVm/5Oae1HngJnsQCdSGqnPpMlFXJQnlMBamGM/9cqkAU cFsNeZJhQAcCHfH9ISuf1UbSY9W3IsWY0vHuOML0= From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/95108] [9/10 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_uhwi_p, at tree.c:7292 Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 10:07:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 10:07:21 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95108 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e09d626551fef9b5719073427170d11e97038c44 commit r10-8293-ge09d626551fef9b5719073427170d11e97038c44 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Thu May 14 09:51:05 2020 +0200 openmp: Fix placement of 2nd+ preparation statement for PHIs in simd cl= one lowering [PR95108] For normal stmts, preparation statements are inserted before the stmt, = so if we need multiple, they are in the correct order, but for PHIs we emit them after labels in the entry successor bb, and we used to emit them in the reverse order that way. 2020-05-14 Jakub Jelinek PR middle-end/95108 * omp-simd-clone.c (struct modify_stmt_info): Add after_stmt member. (ipa_simd_modify_stmt_ops): For PHIs, only add before first stm= t in entry block if info->after_stmt is NULL, otherwise add after th= at stmt and update it after adding each stmt. (ipa_simd_modify_function_body): Initialize info.after_stmt. * gcc.dg/gomp/pr95108.c: New test. (cherry picked from commit d0fb9ffc1b8f3b86bbdf0e915cec2136141b329b)=