From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id ECE9C3870841; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:53:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ECE9C3870841 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1589442796; bh=+0LbnjJ1vjmHucYFGygZ+qKw8C1UsaCq7XTnkmCaHD8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=G0K79ZMGUZy2j3GB9nZki8LtXKRNyhSBstEF8Qryeg3EIQY5ZRWmeG9ffH6tLVzYd i5qowjo/XND85yCP1MZot/FK366BCroBmZFBrFYc1hb+e05f/fBQdXrMeOBEJjIW7Q kvHn2pZ0I0nCZb+BmmI9D7fW1j0LqDg/iNhhjiAk= From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/95108] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_uhwi_p, at tree.c:7292 Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 07:53:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 07:53:17 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95108 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0fb9ffc1b8f3b86bbdf0e915cec2136141b329b commit r11-381-gd0fb9ffc1b8f3b86bbdf0e915cec2136141b329b Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Thu May 14 09:51:05 2020 +0200 openmp: Fix placement of 2nd+ preparation statement for PHIs in simd cl= one lowering [PR95108] For normal stmts, preparation statements are inserted before the stmt, = so if we need multiple, they are in the correct order, but for PHIs we emit them after labels in the entry successor bb, and we used to emit them in the reverse order that way. 2020-05-14 Jakub Jelinek PR middle-end/95108 * omp-simd-clone.c (struct modify_stmt_info): Add after_stmt member. (ipa_simd_modify_stmt_ops): For PHIs, only add before first stm= t in entry block if info->after_stmt is NULL, otherwise add after th= at stmt and update it after adding each stmt. (ipa_simd_modify_function_body): Initialize info.after_stmt. * gcc.dg/gomp/pr95108.c: New test.=