From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E6BF03858C2A; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 07:20:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E6BF03858C2A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1705735212;
	bh=mEP2LcdokSbTcP2PERL22vHirAiMq3mD9tg9dFK8H3w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=xj2zh0kQ0nyzWYnOJu9ZDv2/hoDoz6l2v9/iheBKeT3rqdfyG5gbnV5R2Bi5Thv2w
	 gJnY3jxDqbQ0+pwkyNrdr49wR556tG7tF0j3Jonj6Cl8QL6jzZKr9xsFZz9ntjrc4x
	 sJC0Z9u9pIdQdA+w8/VEuHjYGxKK/mP4YHmYRWjg=
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/95112] i686 procedures have prolog endbr32
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 07:20:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution cc
Message-ID: <bug-95112-4-gAWdyKsL6w@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95112-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95112-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95112

Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
                 CC|                            |sjames at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Alexander Kobets from comment #2)
> Yes, that it.
> I am not sure, that CF must be enabled by default, at your discretion.
> Thank you.

I believe this is Ubuntu's patching of the specs, it doesn't happen upstrea=
m by
default.

It is possible (without making a commitment/official statement on it at all)
that one day --enable-standard-branch-protection might allow configuring th=
is
for CET too but it doesn't right now.=