public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug inline-asm/95121] New: Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently used in place of their corresponding high-byte registers (ah, bh, ch, dh)
@ 2020-05-14 1:32 josephcsible at gmail dot com
2020-05-14 1:42 ` [Bug inline-asm/95121] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: josephcsible at gmail dot com @ 2020-05-14 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95121
Bug ID: 95121
Summary: Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently
used in place of their corresponding high-byte
registers (ah, bh, ch, dh)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: josephcsible at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Consider this function:
char f(void) {
register char x __asm__("dh");
__asm__("movb $42, %%dh" : "=r"(x));
return x;
}
It's supposed to return 42, but it actually returns whatever happened to be in
dl. In general, any time you use a high-byte register for input or output to
inline assembly, GCC will instead erroneously use the corresponding low-byte
register in its place. I tested this with -m32 and -m64, with -O0 through -O3,
and with "=d" and "=Q" as constraints in place of "=r", and it occurred in
every combination I tried. I can reproduce it locally with the gcc:10.1.0
Docker image as well as on Godbolt.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug inline-asm/95121] Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently used in place of their corresponding high-byte registers (ah, bh, ch, dh)
2020-05-14 1:32 [Bug inline-asm/95121] New: Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently used in place of their corresponding high-byte registers (ah, bh, ch, dh) josephcsible at gmail dot com
@ 2020-05-14 1:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-14 1:53 ` josephcsible at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-14 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95121
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
register char x __asm__("dh");
Is the same as:
register char x __asm__("di");
dh and dl are the same register really but the high are low parts can be
modified seperately via some of the 8bit instructions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug inline-asm/95121] Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently used in place of their corresponding high-byte registers (ah, bh, ch, dh)
2020-05-14 1:32 [Bug inline-asm/95121] New: Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently used in place of their corresponding high-byte registers (ah, bh, ch, dh) josephcsible at gmail dot com
2020-05-14 1:42 ` [Bug inline-asm/95121] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-14 1:53 ` josephcsible at gmail dot com
2020-05-14 1:54 ` josephcsible at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: josephcsible at gmail dot com @ 2020-05-14 1:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95121
--- Comment #2 from Joseph C. Sible <josephcsible at gmail dot com> ---
Does this mean that Clang is wrong, then? Because it works the way I
wanted/expected.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug inline-asm/95121] Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently used in place of their corresponding high-byte registers (ah, bh, ch, dh)
2020-05-14 1:32 [Bug inline-asm/95121] New: Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently used in place of their corresponding high-byte registers (ah, bh, ch, dh) josephcsible at gmail dot com
2020-05-14 1:42 ` [Bug inline-asm/95121] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-14 1:53 ` josephcsible at gmail dot com
@ 2020-05-14 1:54 ` josephcsible at gmail dot com
2020-05-14 2:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: josephcsible at gmail dot com @ 2020-05-14 1:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95121
--- Comment #3 from Joseph C. Sible <josephcsible at gmail dot com> ---
Also, is that documented to work that way anywhere? I didn't notice anything in
the manual to that effect.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug inline-asm/95121] Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently used in place of their corresponding high-byte registers (ah, bh, ch, dh)
2020-05-14 1:32 [Bug inline-asm/95121] New: Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently used in place of their corresponding high-byte registers (ah, bh, ch, dh) josephcsible at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-14 1:54 ` josephcsible at gmail dot com
@ 2020-05-14 2:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-14 2:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-14 17:55 ` craig.topper at gmail dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-14 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95121
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Joseph C. Sible from comment #2)
> Does this mean that Clang is wrong, then? Because it works the way I
> wanted/expected.
Depends, this is a GNU extension.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug inline-asm/95121] Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently used in place of their corresponding high-byte registers (ah, bh, ch, dh)
2020-05-14 1:32 [Bug inline-asm/95121] New: Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently used in place of their corresponding high-byte registers (ah, bh, ch, dh) josephcsible at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-14 2:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-14 2:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-14 17:55 ` craig.topper at gmail dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-14 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95121
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Joseph C. Sible from comment #3)
> Also, is that documented to work that way anywhere? I didn't notice anything
> in the manual to that effect.
Register names seems not to be documented, correct.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug inline-asm/95121] Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently used in place of their corresponding high-byte registers (ah, bh, ch, dh)
2020-05-14 1:32 [Bug inline-asm/95121] New: Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently used in place of their corresponding high-byte registers (ah, bh, ch, dh) josephcsible at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-14 2:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-14 17:55 ` craig.topper at gmail dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: craig.topper at gmail dot com @ 2020-05-14 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95121
Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |craig.topper at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail dot com> ---
Could gcc at least emit an error?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-14 17:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-14 1:32 [Bug inline-asm/95121] New: Wrong code generated: low-byte registers are silently used in place of their corresponding high-byte registers (ah, bh, ch, dh) josephcsible at gmail dot com
2020-05-14 1:42 ` [Bug inline-asm/95121] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-14 1:53 ` josephcsible at gmail dot com
2020-05-14 1:54 ` josephcsible at gmail dot com
2020-05-14 2:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-14 2:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-14 17:55 ` craig.topper at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).