From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A75B238708DA; Thu, 14 May 2020 17:27:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A75B238708DA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1589477271; bh=6chYlfU36ZJ8DBY3ygG9Se2vQZbDqoHLfXzjobkoclk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YjuEF1q8o29Bk6iqtAA9Ea57z5RNQu56X0AGU+LF/dntUIru+HaGwtpbSxlHwtS6H A59xSF7MxhMxUhfOe+kSSMOwFDGdEVM0JL9YD9od2QHujTjTU6oAf3sdRXuRphCtfX sNpW9xworh/NoJqtOEccWxASzsOA435N4XTRrNUU= From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/95130] GCC ignoring attribute(format(gnu_printf)) on printf in mingw Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 17:27:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 17:27:51 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95130 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- See bug 92292. The extra attribute isn't ignored, it simply means the=20 function has multiple format attributes, which is valid, but should=20 probably be special-cased for this case of built-in functions.=