From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 469533870C16; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 10:18:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 469533870C16
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1692440293;
	bh=QdzWviroCTcAFu6kaKqMFMumTT0sRYQxoqNfZtIHx+4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=J6x6UgOT/HQQ0WoIGYGQVCWaSIib7CS8zSb0sYmnFUnq9Q/ZAW5AgeXbNqWD/OdmF
	 8Pj+G8QTR24BKU2dykWz4dkObV7zHrjQy4gXP89DkvhiIK0H0reLFvsftsgac3LgaZ
	 soPam7tHAmKD89wlyCXme7JOwbl/vqkHzR4JuVro=
From: "tanksherman27 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/95130] GCC ignoring attribute(format(gnu_printf)) on printf
 in mingw
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 10:18:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tanksherman27 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95130-4-vZXTZKl3G1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95130-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95130-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95130

--- Comment #19 from Julian Waters <tanksherman27 at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Tomas Kalibera from comment #17)
> (In reply to Tomas Kalibera from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Julian Waters from comment #15)
> > > It seems like the patch also doesn't fix the strftime case too, stran=
gely
> > > enough. gcc with that patch applied still causes a compilation failur=
e in
> > > the Windows JDK when encountering strftime with the %T specifier
> >=20
> >
> > I don't easily see why the patch doesn't help with %T in strftime. In
> > MinGW-W64 10, strftime doesn't seem to have a format attribute at all, =
so
> > the patch couldn't help. But in MinGW-W64 11, the gnu_strftime format
> > attribute is present.
>=20
> The older version of the patch I use with gcc 12 doesn't seem to be helpi=
ng
> with %T, but the newer one (patch_master.diff) helps with %T on the curre=
nt
> gcc master (gcc 14) and the current gcc 13 branch (gcc 13.2). Tested with
> MinGW-W64 11.0.1.

If I may ask, could I have the link to patch_master.diff?=