From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 42D03395CCB4; Thu, 14 May 2020 19:25:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 42D03395CCB4
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1589484352;
 bh=JCUk9DfHGm+KVvbkPaMbpMk8n7DUmgXzgeBsrC2UZG8=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=eLGfOWIBXkeflX8VvekFnAwbJAh+ti7lGuDsI9xahAJGhq9bTqlUN/WeBOzWu9wD+
 5N2Bhc+VbvLrf3iZPBVdk2odbw1g1bcu0qcNgN3MfybsmD3ND+61tHqUW16zbcF0bw
 bxIPaZUXavprIOU6Wc4n2qMMKWEBuXhaNUFW6Qmo=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/95140] [10/11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overflow
 for a loop unrolled past the end of a trailing array
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 19:25:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95140-4-lASQrllNJJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95140-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95140-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 19:25:52 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95140

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The warning should change, not the conservative assumption.  There is a lot=
 of
code in the wild with such trailing arrays, not everything uses flexible ar=
ray
members, [0] or [1] for that.=