public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/95141] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Incorrect integer overflow warning message for bitand expression
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 07:40:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-95141-4-x0TybM1yu7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-95141-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95141

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener <rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a88caf21a0a85129f6c985ca13ba3eb54ff5366

commit r11-509-g4a88caf21a0a85129f6c985ca13ba3eb54ff5366
Author: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date:   Tue May 19 07:58:33 2020 +0200

    c/95141 - fix bogus integer overflow warning

    This fixes an integer overflow warning that ultimatively happens because
    of TREE_OVERFLOW propagating through transforms and the existing guard
    against this,

    375           if (TREE_OVERFLOW_P (ret)
    376               && !TREE_OVERFLOW_P (op0)
    377               && !TREE_OVERFLOW_P (op1))
    378             overflow_warning (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (expr, input_location,

    being insufficient.  Rather than trying to use sth like walk_tree to
    exhaustively walk operands (with the possibility of introducing
    quadraticness when folding larger expressions recursively) the
    following amends the above with an ad-hoc test for a binary op0
    with a possibly constant op1.

    2020-05-30  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

            PR c/95141
    gcc/c
            * c-fold.c (c_fully_fold_internal): Enhance guard on
            overflow_warning.

    gcc/testsuite
            * gcc.dg/pr95141.c: New testcase.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-20  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-14 19:51 [Bug c/95141] New: " yadongh at vt dot edu
2020-05-15  7:30 ` [Bug c/95141] [8/9/10/11 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-15  9:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-18 13:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-20  7:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-05-20  7:42 ` [Bug c/95141] [8/9/10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-23 11:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-23 11:08 ` [Bug c/95141] [8/9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14  9:53 ` [Bug c/95141] [9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01  8:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27  8:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-95141-4-x0TybM1yu7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).