From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D2550386F457; Fri, 15 May 2020 10:32:14 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D2550386F457 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1589538734; bh=JU9L0fPXeprlwRTBnhUdopvFT5PdaS0a7gPwkN4NDi4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=X3ZUbQOY1xza33hTvLjE/DHZuLd27EdtXLIZSveauzhajhEdzZTBLn5c7aYEnkyHI U7CloF7hCjx5vvkFzHNIH+W2S27keAbJV3RtQaigddIUcMt8Xw0dO+sTiEFNz+J5Q/ UpTRpYymPoseQYG6ramhVAOEvyRax2KJC6vXm7IQ= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/95149] lex.c:1729:8: warning: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Wstring-compare] Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 10:32:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 10:32:14 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95149 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- And? It is unspecified if "foo" =3D=3D "foo", not whether "foo" can compare equa= l to an automatic variable (it can't).=