public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/95153] New: Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable
@ 2020-05-15 13:37 alisdairm at me dot com
  2020-05-15 14:02 ` [Bug c++/95153] " alisdairm at me dot com
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: alisdairm at me dot com @ 2020-05-15 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95153

            Bug ID: 95153
           Summary: Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable
           Product: gcc
           Version: 10.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: alisdairm at me dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

In general, we do not expect array types to be copyable according to the
'is_copy_constructible_v' trait.  However, the following started passing in gcc
10:

#include <type_traits>
static_assert(!std::is_copy_constructible_v<const void *[13]>);

Note that the 'const' is important, arrays of 'void *' remain non-copyable
according to the trait.

'void' may be a specific trigger too, as arrays of 'const int *' do not have
this problem.

Finally, the array bound does not seem significant, other than it gives the
expected answer again for an array of unknown bound.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/95153] Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable
  2020-05-15 13:37 [Bug c++/95153] New: Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable alisdairm at me dot com
@ 2020-05-15 14:02 ` alisdairm at me dot com
  2020-05-15 16:39 ` [Bug c++/95153] Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable in C++20 rs2740 at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: alisdairm at me dot com @ 2020-05-15 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95153

--- Comment #1 from Alisdair Meredith <alisdairm at me dot com> ---
Forgot to add this is specific to -std=c++20 too.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/95153] Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable in C++20
  2020-05-15 13:37 [Bug c++/95153] New: Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable alisdairm at me dot com
  2020-05-15 14:02 ` [Bug c++/95153] " alisdairm at me dot com
@ 2020-05-15 16:39 ` rs2740 at gmail dot com
  2020-07-06 12:28 ` alisdairm at me dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rs2740 at gmail dot com @ 2020-05-15 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95153

TC <rs2740 at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rs2740 at gmail dot com

--- Comment #2 from TC <rs2740 at gmail dot com> ---
This is behaving as specified.

const void* const a[10];
const void* const b[10](a);

is valid code in C++20; it initializes b[0] with &a[0] converted to a const
void*, and the rest of b with null pointers.

The void* case is

void* const a[10];
void* const b[10](a);

which is invalid because &a[0] is a void* const*; converting that to void* is
not allowed because it casts away constness.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/95153] Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable in C++20
  2020-05-15 13:37 [Bug c++/95153] New: Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable alisdairm at me dot com
  2020-05-15 14:02 ` [Bug c++/95153] " alisdairm at me dot com
  2020-05-15 16:39 ` [Bug c++/95153] Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable in C++20 rs2740 at gmail dot com
@ 2020-07-06 12:28 ` alisdairm at me dot com
  2020-07-06 12:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-03-11 18:29 ` barry.revzin at gmail dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: alisdairm at me dot com @ 2020-07-06 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95153

--- Comment #3 from Alisdair Meredith <alisdairm at me dot com> ---
Sorry, thought I had confirmed that I agree with the analysis above - this is a
(perhaps surprising) change to the specification of C++20.

What is the best way to withdraw this report as invalid?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/95153] Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable in C++20
  2020-05-15 13:37 [Bug c++/95153] New: Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable alisdairm at me dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-06 12:28 ` alisdairm at me dot com
@ 2020-07-06 12:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-03-11 18:29 ` barry.revzin at gmail dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-06 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95153

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Status -> RESOLVED INVALID

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/95153] Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable in C++20
  2020-05-15 13:37 [Bug c++/95153] New: Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable alisdairm at me dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-06 12:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-11 18:29 ` barry.revzin at gmail dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: barry.revzin at gmail dot com @ 2022-03-11 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95153

Barry Revzin <barry.revzin at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |barry.revzin at gmail dot com

--- Comment #5 from Barry Revzin <barry.revzin at gmail dot com> ---
Just to follow up, gcc trunk right now does this:

int main() {
    int a[3]{};
    void const* b[3](a);  // ok

    void const* c[3]{};
    void const* d[3](c);  // error: array must be initialized with a
brace-enclosed initializer
}

If 'd' is actually an error, then it's not because of that, so at the very
least, the diagnostic is wrong.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-11 18:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-15 13:37 [Bug c++/95153] New: Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable alisdairm at me dot com
2020-05-15 14:02 ` [Bug c++/95153] " alisdairm at me dot com
2020-05-15 16:39 ` [Bug c++/95153] Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable in C++20 rs2740 at gmail dot com
2020-07-06 12:28 ` alisdairm at me dot com
2020-07-06 12:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-11 18:29 ` barry.revzin at gmail dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).