* [Bug preprocessor/95183] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct)
2020-05-18 5:34 [Bug preprocessor/95183] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct) asolokha at gmx dot com
@ 2020-05-18 6:04 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-18 6:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-18 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95183
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed| |2020-05-18
Known to fail| |11.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to work| |10.0
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed, it really started with Nathan's commit.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/95183] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct)
2020-05-18 5:34 [Bug preprocessor/95183] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct) asolokha at gmx dot com
2020-05-18 6:04 ` [Bug preprocessor/95183] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-18 6:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-18 12:35 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-18 6:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95183
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/95183] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct)
2020-05-18 5:34 [Bug preprocessor/95183] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct) asolokha at gmx dot com
2020-05-18 6:04 ` [Bug preprocessor/95183] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-18 6:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-18 12:35 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-18 14:36 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-18 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95183
Nathan Sidwell <nathan at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/95183] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct)
2020-05-18 5:34 [Bug preprocessor/95183] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct) asolokha at gmx dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-18 12:35 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-18 14:36 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-18 15:43 ` asolokha at gmx dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-18 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95183
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell <nathan at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is a bug, but you're running a --traditional C preprocessor test through
the c++ compiler, right? (A regular test run doesn't fail this test for me at
least)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/95183] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct)
2020-05-18 5:34 [Bug preprocessor/95183] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct) asolokha at gmx dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-18 14:36 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-18 15:43 ` asolokha at gmx dot com
2020-05-19 13:21 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-19 14:01 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: asolokha at gmx dot com @ 2020-05-18 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95183
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha <asolokha at gmx dot com> ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #2)
> This is a bug, but you're running a --traditional C preprocessor test
> through the c++ compiler, right?
Through the C compiler, but otherwise yes. I've posted the compiler invocation
in comment 0 verbatim.
> (A regular test run doesn't fail this test
> for me at least)
Yep, because trad.exp adds -traditional-cpp, as intended. But I don't run the
testsuite, but rather use its test cases as part of my larger test corpus,
compiling every individual case in that corpus with randomly chosen compiler
options. IOW, my testing ignores DejaGNU directives in gcc testsuite (which
means it also often ignores common sense when choosing compiler options, as a
consequence).
I can further describe my setup if you are interested, but it's off-topic in
this PR.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/95183] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct)
2020-05-18 5:34 [Bug preprocessor/95183] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct) asolokha at gmx dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-18 15:43 ` asolokha at gmx dot com
@ 2020-05-19 13:21 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-19 14:01 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-19 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95183
Nathan Sidwell <nathan at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell <nathan at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed a641d6d3e63
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/95183] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct)
2020-05-18 5:34 [Bug preprocessor/95183] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct) asolokha at gmx dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-19 13:21 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-19 14:01 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-19 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95183
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell <nathan at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
patch got attached to p95182, because reasons
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread