From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 860703857738; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:14:16 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 860703857738
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1694470456;
	bh=QRp6dEeZnwn4dfUPDBOtie/uOp+4oIg49R1SpkmM4hw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=lIBZ6mCD4mWdLPjO/dCUCvhuXgtQvS9YqWx8lvG7Tf6LpHvc8JXsDcYBrixB3LLxu
	 n26rnAa4F1OrGGEihtaLfCug9P+SnjFq8H/JGpNlZnoWO0iXPQ1unU60nFq0Dk0Xen
	 3maQ2K4oTfpDVf14RHOWfC/9rES70uVTthVoR4Cg=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/95185] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Failure to
 optimize specific kind of sign comparison check
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:14:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easyhack, missed-optimization, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to keywords short_desc
 cf_known_to_work target_milestone cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-95185-4-KEnKW8Fw9e@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95185

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
           Assignee|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org         |unassigned at gcc d=
ot gnu.org
           Keywords|                            |needs-bisection
            Summary|Failure to optimize         |[11/12/13/14 Regression]
                   |specific kind of sign       |Failure to optimize
                   |comparison check            |specific kind of sign
                   |                            |comparison check
      Known to work|                            |8.5.0
   Target Milestone|---                         |11.5
      Known to fail|                            |9.1.0

--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The original testcase is actually a regression.=