public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/95189] [9/10 Regression] memcmp being wrongly stripped like strcmp
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 22:37:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-95189-4-WsY563RvIV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-95189-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95189
Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 from Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Is the patch eligible for backporting?
Users are hitting this as shown by dups and questions elsewhere like
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63724679/wrong-gcc-9-and-higher-optimization-of-memcmp-with-fno-inline
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-03 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-18 13:56 [Bug c/95189] New: memcmp being wrongly stripped (regression) gcc at pkh dot me
2020-05-19 6:28 ` [Bug middle-end/95189] [10/11 Regression] memcmp being wrongly stripped like strcmp rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-23 21:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-23 21:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-24 20:10 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-09 13:38 ` gcc at pkh dot me
2020-06-09 23:53 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-24 21:24 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 0:25 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 14:46 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-13 15:50 ` jerryfromearth at gmail dot com
2020-07-20 18:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-20 18:10 ` [Bug middle-end/95189] [10 " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-08-16 20:26 ` [Bug middle-end/95189] [9/10 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-08-16 20:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-03 22:37 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-09-06 23:28 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-27 14:22 ` public at timruffing dot de
2020-10-05 23:41 ` luke-jr+gccbugs at utopios dot org
2020-10-06 5:47 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-07 22:49 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2020-10-08 4:31 ` luke-jr+gccbugs at utopios dot org
2020-10-08 18:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-08 18:40 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-08 22:51 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2020-10-09 0:12 ` luke-jr+gccbugs at utopios dot org
2020-10-09 2:26 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2020-10-09 13:09 ` luke-jr+gccbugs at utopios dot org
2021-01-02 5:05 ` davmac at davmac dot org
2021-06-01 8:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-24 1:13 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2021-06-24 6:29 ` [Bug middle-end/95189] [9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-17 19:47 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 8:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-95189-4-WsY563RvIV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).