From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 091C63840C18; Wed, 20 May 2020 08:51:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 091C63840C18
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1589964667;
 bh=qo/Ls0jI5HJpDPQhujms8RXzA0UXKdedoBToRTo2FCk=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=XUkT+NmDYhhDLbuDS2rCvlryADbvmQ3d3xFOKZj63sujJaNjwOoNgjL4kv7hjkVdd
 eGDBXUXL5n93GRBp6NfpgQk0w46PK41shIlzZNM1gaRCkjIX3YgpUaWNnpXcj+UxVX
 bXB/78DLhDnM4q++jeS0ZRAp8AFZbSxxZNm/PQKk=
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/95229] [11 Regression] in mark_jump_label_1
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 08:51:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed cf_known_to_fail keywords short_desc
 cf_reconfirmed_on target_milestone bug_status
 blocked cf_known_to_work version cc
Message-ID: <bug-95229-4-MUH7flfdeH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95229-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95229-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 08:51:07 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95229

Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
      Known to fail|                            |11.0
           Keywords|                            |needs-bisection
            Summary|ice in mark_jump_label_1    |[11 Regression] in
                   |                            |mark_jump_label_1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-05-20
   Target Milestone|---                         |11.0
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
             Blocks|                            |26163
      Known to work|                            |10.1.0
            Version|unknown                     |11.0
                 CC|                            |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26163
[Bug 26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95=
)=