From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 0F782388A810; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:20:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0F782388A810
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1590812457;
 bh=qfoC+h/wd4/jQLDSuyDyUz0vqd2WhT0m6ltCt5L8zfI=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=fvwzc5ij+UFILWQiH+v8lGba+P8DLlrZsTyMPYWsgX06TivqehelGRi6yJFfXrD5U
 X0+2S6t3T5omRvSMEDb+XTZXg0x9EuOFzyyqbEUkSiU8cu0zMqQQLf2oOo8ep651Po
 l7ajeoxvxMtQ9Hq8Ce4Ulb2zX1tGehoE9zSbH4dA=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/95241] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check:
 expected integer_cst, have range_expr in to_wide, at tree.h:5900
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 04:20:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95241-4-CiYdY4Pi2u@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95241-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95241-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 04:20:57 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95241

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
<ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:798a9da416bbfd8996da9a5d53955b082d5b94fe

commit r10-8213-g798a9da416bbfd8996da9a5d53955b082d5b94fe
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri May 29 09:44:09 2020 -0400

    c++: constexpr ctor with RANGE_EXPR index [PR95241]

    In the testcase below, the CONSTRUCTOR for 'field' contains a RANGE_EXPR
    index:

      {{aggr_init_expr<...>, [1...2]=3D{.off=3D1}}}

    but get_or_insert_ctor_field isn't prepared to handle looking up a
    RANGE_EXPR index.

    This patch adds limited support to get_or_insert_ctor_field for looking
    up a RANGE_EXPR index.  The limited scope of this patch should make it
    more suitable for backporting, and more extensive support would be
    needed only to handle self-modifying CONSTRUCTORs that contain a
    RANGE_EXPR index, but I haven't yet been able to come up with a testcase
    that actually creates such a CONSTRUCTOR.

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/95241
            * constexpr.c (get_or_insert_ctor_field): Add limited support
            for RANGE_EXPR index lookups.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/95241
            * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array25.C: New test.

    (cherry picked from commit e069285cdf457cc85070e522380c4e25b0d2ed25)=