public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/95261] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478
@ 2020-05-21 17:50 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2020-05-22 6:26 ` [Bug target/95261] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com @ 2020-05-21 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261
Bug ID: 95261
Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and
gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with
r11-478
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:a4b48fc47c3406b6f41be093c4615879b7006710, r11-478
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "vectorization
is not profitable" 1
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "vectorization
is not profitable" 1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/95261] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478
2020-05-21 17:50 [Bug target/95261] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
@ 2020-05-22 6:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-25 14:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-22 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed| |2020-05-22
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I will have a look.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/95261] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478
2020-05-21 17:50 [Bug target/95261] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2020-05-22 6:26 ` [Bug target/95261] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-25 14:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-26 17:35 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2020-10-16 11:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-25 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
g:dc0c0196340f7ac58b10d0042d7cea776d6f7864 might have fixed this, can you
verify?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/95261] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478
2020-05-21 17:50 [Bug target/95261] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2020-05-22 6:26 ` [Bug target/95261] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-25 14:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-26 17:35 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2020-10-16 11:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com @ 2020-05-26 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261
--- Comment #3 from Bill Seurer <seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> ---
I just tried on current trunk and these have cleared up now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/95261] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478
2020-05-21 17:50 [Bug target/95261] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-26 17:35 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
@ 2020-10-16 11:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-16 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-16 11:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-21 17:50 [Bug target/95261] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2020-05-22 6:26 ` [Bug target/95261] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-25 14:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-26 17:35 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2020-10-16 11:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).