public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/95261] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 @ 2020-05-21 17:50 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2020-05-22 6:26 ` [Bug target/95261] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com @ 2020-05-21 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261 Bug ID: 95261 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com Target Milestone: --- g:a4b48fc47c3406b6f41be093c4615879b7006710, r11-478 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "vectorization is not profitable" 1 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "vectorization is not profitable" 1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/95261] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 2020-05-21 17:50 [Bug target/95261] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com @ 2020-05-22 6:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-05-25 14:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-22 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed| |2020-05-22 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|--- |11.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I will have a look. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/95261] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 2020-05-21 17:50 [Bug target/95261] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2020-05-22 6:26 ` [Bug target/95261] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-25 14:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-05-26 17:35 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2020-10-16 11:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-25 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |WAITING --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- g:dc0c0196340f7ac58b10d0042d7cea776d6f7864 might have fixed this, can you verify? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/95261] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 2020-05-21 17:50 [Bug target/95261] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2020-05-22 6:26 ` [Bug target/95261] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-05-25 14:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-26 17:35 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2020-10-16 11:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com @ 2020-05-26 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261 --- Comment #3 from Bill Seurer <seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> --- I just tried on current trunk and these have cleared up now. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/95261] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 2020-05-21 17:50 [Bug target/95261] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2020-05-26 17:35 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com @ 2020-10-16 11:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-16 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Fixed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-16 11:47 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-05-21 17:50 [Bug target/95261] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2020-05-22 6:26 ` [Bug target/95261] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-05-25 14:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-05-26 17:35 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com 2020-10-16 11:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).