From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id A0C693851C0C; Fri, 22 May 2020 09:44:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A0C693851C0C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1590140678;
 bh=tAcqibeq0TFfConn+9BfVMB4uBygfbDjSjJGzEYYAG0=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=VYkhmk+gFW1aAxIwwKEV3CEO1MYTRnmwqX52hZN2bszQlVMcDXU23hLcM2hwQWJvA
 9I3q4l0mRJZNSAUaXyMDO4hWh6eYxAUTademNv5aehL2h1lK4Q2iy1ybu+1hfIINVn
 Mtf+OFTmsz8RV5xEoZ2cJCCx9w0YhBFr50c4Jxsw=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/95264] Infinite Loop When Compiling Templated C++ code at
 -O1 and above
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 09:44:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-95264-4-kWddfTTW0O@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95264-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95264-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 09:44:38 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95264

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-05-22
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So with the [[gnu::flatten]] attributes removed -O1 needs 80 seconds to com=
pile
and about 3GB of memory, -O2 needs around 2 minutes (same memory), -O3
is the same as -O2.

Maybe instead of [[gnu::flatten]] you want to bump --param inline-unit-grow=
th
or --param large-function-growth more moderately in case you can measure an
effect on runtime.

Note multiple [[gnu::flatten]] can really exponentially grow program size
since it is not appearant which functions might be used from another
translation unit until you can use -fwhole-program (single CU program)
or -flto (but there [[gnu::flatten]] is applied to early to avoid such
growth - sth we might want to fix).  Placing things not used from outside
in anonymous namespaces might help.=