From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1DCC0386EC5C; Sun, 24 May 2020 12:44:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1DCC0386EC5C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1590324279; bh=KndnyyQMox4rD1va/AxkqgRQ5Lp99KmjApGvgvL1WV0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EwWB5dHeQldWWDpcdG/+HyQ5lB4+n1S4tVEw0zHkVlUIChLuSR+qIEmwoJ9aELJ3n ZLUorWUxCe+suOAgbdodx/jG1h3owWGuygK//R3LaxWWiubVmr+KAfYE+maL43pcSm AJA3cQZjUl2ZXjR2GG6aKUjHT9MEHiE7scx/ZYu8= From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug jit/95296] Segfault when trying to return a void value Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 12:44:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: jit X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 12:44:39 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95296 David Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2020-05-24 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Thanks for filing this. It looks like calls to (at least): gcc_jit_function_new_local gcc_jit_context_new_global should gracefully fail with an error if the client code attempts to create a variable of void type. Similarly we may need additional checking throughout for uses of rvalues of void type (but I need to check this).=