From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id CD3AB3860017; Sun, 24 May 2020 01:33:09 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CD3AB3860017
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1590283989;
 bh=AvL3kn0ygCWfSYcYtkNXOGXNm9MZ515hlZcCvy9Gwgk=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=B79dGdmRsZuPyVbOyBal4aJ6oS5pFsg6Wk/Doa1H/P18n2Xvb1bPep4+bf46X3C60
 6F9z4VIkAumgkiNlsJ48K8BBxlmb9tLOV2XxQeRu0GjyoS+2/4V0A6R9C1u5ZMbZRi
 R6u1Qt/O9rY4uBiEwaFiinyjS0QQHmXMHn3NG+Ww=
From: "bouanto at zoho dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug jit/95296] New: Segfault when trying to return a void value
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 01:33:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: jit
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bouanto at zoho dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
 attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-95296-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 01:33:10 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95296

            Bug ID: 95296
           Summary: Segfault when trying to return a void value
           Product: gcc
           Version: 10.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: jit
          Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: bouanto at zoho dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 48589
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D48589&action=3Dedit
Complete example reproducing the segfault

Hi.

When trying to return a void value this way, this makes the code segfault:

    gcc_jit_type *void_type =3D gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt,
GCC_JIT_TYPE_VOID);
    gcc_jit_lvalue *return_value =3D gcc_jit_function_new_local(func, NULL,
void_type, "void");
    gcc_jit_block_end_with_return (block, NULL,
gcc_jit_lvalue_as_rvalue(return_value));

Could you please fix it so that it shows an error instead of segfaulting?
Thanks.=