From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 36D13386F41D; Mon, 25 May 2020 19:41:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 36D13386F41D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1590435675; bh=PVvNj0ukn4RBIyla+TThIbBw5Ao/uA7idARH1TmPmco=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ly8m5wT6YpkU2910BhXDyW6Gev2zJilumd9IVcZ5VvGKtFHm/i6ku1WVpgU3fmbvr OjDMvVD3/6CEgs3aUR/hDwUxJmoQqQgFfPK8xZtIU/b3yp3HwhfPLXZquI3ebY1sLO ofoxvC4DOSNH1xiJa1b24w0jqfhDFwhRzSe02b6o= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/95318] gcc 10.1 on x86_64 fails to build aarch64 cross-compiler when using default optimization settings Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 19:41:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: assemble-failure, build X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 19:41:15 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95318 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- The assembler code works for me with binutils 2.33.1. So again which versi= on of binutils are you using for the cross compiler?=