From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0D68F3870847; Thu, 28 May 2020 18:51:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0D68F3870847 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1590691913; bh=p3uh0IOPJdpLOBGFKkfYBC7oSPHzovdQT6zvKUHp9g0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ln2pMUCyM1CUQblsl7w56juxLQ5ccQBKNswR2Rqp//tMeUQ6R8Bw06lzTSqrHGvav zosL+djGcQyo3aLhMTtn4Tf9d69m2XlYuOfHVfZLLN2jeBhJP93o0tuLBbSH6RnONX WtMKTIFtcbYKWIqaoNPGRYIN0aNjBCrMrwORWTQc= From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/95322] std::list | take | transform, expression does not work cbegin() == end() Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 18:51:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 18:51:53 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95322 --- Comment #12 from Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler --- (In reply to Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler from comment #7) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6) > > A new LWG issue has been submitted, and there is a suggested resolution. >=20 > Will take care and inform in this issue here. The new LWG issue exists now: https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3448=