public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug jit/95325] New: Support 128-bit integers @ 2020-05-25 23:31 bouanto at zoho dot com 2020-05-26 7:21 ` [Bug jit/95325] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (5 more replies) 0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: bouanto at zoho dot com @ 2020-05-25 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95325 Bug ID: 95325 Summary: Support 128-bit integers Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: bouanto at zoho dot com Target Milestone: --- Hi. Would it be possible to add support for 128-bit integers in libgccjit? Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug jit/95325] Support 128-bit integers 2020-05-25 23:31 [Bug jit/95325] New: Support 128-bit integers bouanto at zoho dot com @ 2020-05-26 7:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-18 12:26 ` bouanto at zoho dot com ` (4 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-26 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95325 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug jit/95325] Support 128-bit integers 2020-05-25 23:31 [Bug jit/95325] New: Support 128-bit integers bouanto at zoho dot com 2020-05-26 7:21 ` [Bug jit/95325] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-18 12:26 ` bouanto at zoho dot com 2021-11-20 0:28 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: bouanto at zoho dot com @ 2021-05-18 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95325 --- Comment #1 from Antoni <bouanto at zoho dot com> --- Created attachment 50835 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50835&action=edit Patch add support for sized integer types That patch not only add support for 128-bit integers, but also all other sized integers. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug jit/95325] Support 128-bit integers 2020-05-25 23:31 [Bug jit/95325] New: Support 128-bit integers bouanto at zoho dot com 2020-05-26 7:21 ` [Bug jit/95325] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-18 12:26 ` bouanto at zoho dot com @ 2021-11-20 0:28 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-20 0:31 ` bouanto at zoho dot com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-20 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95325 David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2021-11-20 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Thanks for working on this; sorry for the delay in reviewing your various patches. I think that the current status of this is that I found some issues when reviewing it; see: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/jit/2021q2/001303.html Is there an updated version after that that I've missed? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug jit/95325] Support 128-bit integers 2020-05-25 23:31 [Bug jit/95325] New: Support 128-bit integers bouanto at zoho dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2021-11-20 0:28 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-20 0:31 ` bouanto at zoho dot com 2022-04-12 21:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-13 20:37 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: bouanto at zoho dot com @ 2021-11-20 0:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95325 --- Comment #3 from Antoni <bouanto at zoho dot com> --- No. The only patch that is ready for review is "libgccjit: add some reflection functions in the jit C api". ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug jit/95325] Support 128-bit integers 2020-05-25 23:31 [Bug jit/95325] New: Support 128-bit integers bouanto at zoho dot com ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2021-11-20 0:31 ` bouanto at zoho dot com @ 2022-04-12 21:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-13 20:37 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-12 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95325 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm <dmalcolm@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af80ea97b61847d91da0d303e85faed437059092 commit r12-8116-gaf80ea97b61847d91da0d303e85faed437059092 Author: Antoni Boucher <bouanto@zoho.com> Date: Tue Apr 12 17:16:45 2022 -0400 libgccjit: Add support for sized integer types, including 128-bit integers [PR95325] gcc/jit/ PR target/95325 * docs/_build/texinfo/libgccjit.texi: Regenerate * docs/topics/compatibility.rst (LIBGCCJIT_ABI_20): New ABI tag. * docs/topics/types.rst: Add documentation for the new types GCC_JIT_TYPE_UINT8_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_UINT16_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_UINT32_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_UINT64_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_UINT128_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT8_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT16_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT32_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT64_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT128_T and new functions (gcc_jit_compatible_types, gcc_jit_type_get_size). * jit-builtins.cc: Add support for BT_UINT128. * jit-common.h: Update the value of NUM_GCC_JIT_TYPES. * jit-playback.cc: Add support for the sized integer types. * jit-recording.cc: Add support for the sized integer types. * jit-recording.h: Add support for comparing integer types and new function (is_signed). * libgccjit.cc (gcc_jit_compatible_types): New. (gcc_jit_type_get_size) New. * libgccjit.h: New enum variants for gcc_jit_types (GCC_JIT_TYPE_UINT8_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_UINT16_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_UINT32_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_UINT64_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_UINT128_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT8_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT16_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT32_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT64_T, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT128_T) and new functions (gcc_jit_compatible_types, gcc_jit_type_get_size). * libgccjit.map (LIBGCCJIT_ABI_20): New ABI tag. gcc/testsuite/ PR target/95325 * jit.dg/test-types.c: Add tests for sized integer types. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug jit/95325] Support 128-bit integers 2020-05-25 23:31 [Bug jit/95325] New: Support 128-bit integers bouanto at zoho dot com ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2022-04-12 21:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-13 20:37 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-13 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95325 David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Marking as resolved; please reopen if there's an issue integrating the version of the patch I committed with rustc_codegen_gcc. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-13 20:37 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-05-25 23:31 [Bug jit/95325] New: Support 128-bit integers bouanto at zoho dot com 2020-05-26 7:21 ` [Bug jit/95325] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-18 12:26 ` bouanto at zoho dot com 2021-11-20 0:28 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-20 0:31 ` bouanto at zoho dot com 2022-04-12 21:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-13 20:37 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).