From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 7FBD0387084C; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 06:35:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7FBD0387084C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1592375724;
 bh=NNsc17HEtIsZpYYqxMG3zUSOhp7YlpwhZQfvyHVo48s=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=NF81k18ui3A0oPoUMog01Y9nMaMpzndivKcP203OMazgMM0Aag1udREHcE2SdHkav
 p+N2tAm+acmqV6DzRLxkwqo6842XebqKPB2kzz6l1iPTrfQbhgXu6vPWBWheErkXY2
 ivdqPtISMpODowgItdgYi5D3SYIBL5ZFqaiK4V3U=
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in
 the profiling data file, ICC does NOT
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 06:35:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-95348-4-1nzDKttQlZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95348-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95348-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 06:35:24 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95348

Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #40 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #39)
> (In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #38)
> > Created attachment 48738 [details]
> > Patch candidate v2
> I have added this patch to my private gcc 8 with some change, works fine
> with the small testing case, and fixed the bug I reported in comment #36.=
=20

Great! Please report collected statistics for the patch and I'm also curious
about a parallel gcov-tool merging?

> >=20
> > There's a properly tested patch that supports all operations.
> > Please apply also pending patch:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/548206.html
>=20
> do I need to apply this as well in order to get the data from the real
> application? (note I need to apply the patch to gcc 8, this patch is not
> easy to be applied to gcc 8).

This patch is already applied to master and it does not effect GCC 8 branch=
.=