From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CE3173898528; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 18:08:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CE3173898528 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1591898893; bh=udKVTQtZceQs0pzmXzPXf3xVRlxKarGgshI0eI5QkH8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DGoefUHdtL77v+6+FH0B/U7ppEYGSl3VwlZViy/QlrfN18nSQ0CMQQyO7tWhEIoQq QP4g99oP5odqHxMlOkQeqFyc2GADhqPDjqRWKDUAdBnyWRJtDKwxjLjbJwaR1YktFQ DW628YmnnV5m5z27k/+vRJCrCQaxHdQW++Cj5aio= From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 18:08:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 18:08:13 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95348 --- Comment #35 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- (In reply to Qing Zhao from comment #34) > >=20 > >> Though still bigger than what ICC generated. > >=20 > > Yep, but we should be only 2x bigger right now? > Yes, around 2-3 times bigger, much better now. Fine. I'm going to finalize the patch and send to it GCC mailing list. > >=20 > > Can you please test the parallel merging script? I can merge 10GB gcov = files > > (5000 runs with 264 files each) in about 50s. >=20 > I will make the request soon (I don=E2=80=99t have the permission to do t= his). Might > might take some time for others to do this. Thanks.=