From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2D421388C01D; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:16:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2D421388C01D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1591777000; bh=cihiOiujH6Myv+bnBNswJO75zTSvBVoiHbt7v/NSo5Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=G/WrR6N7xEcneQQvpzsGVaYvjOXl4oZ9yu3bTNgo2Yef7IslB8Z+1vKoha+Cx0iO6 6Spb7HuE45Vwmy8EJoo5Swk6qtJbhRDQepZOA4R0rk9em4idS2zo+xkbE98oHgaQ6I g9Ku+yGyYhifMyk9HmmTL+XbAkfNfiYsX2w6+c7c= From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:16:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:16:40 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95348 --- Comment #27 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- (In reply to qinzhao from comment #24) > with the patch added to gcc11, I tested it with the small testing case, a= nd > got the following data: >=20 I would be more interested in overall statistics for your training scenario. How much can you get from ~1TB of data?=