From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 26523386F477; Fri, 29 May 2020 15:43:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 26523386F477 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1590767038; bh=TJjCWSRJkxZVWR/nXripPiH28fiTXhcELT/ngEGGT6k=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=r1PWkgZjgG7ZIeRPaAmUsAwe+CtU3T/H6YfYnJ5zvxrJOl+3cK6EbmsUbojbf7LKp RTD2wF3ZtThNRz2CIKGcz3NAoVD2+drJg8YHZhz0qPD6KV/r22N4b9xMs7QvD4Qj6r +kRQk9+fR0KgdSVYZPNruJ3r5WJGzr0KkIEbjTAE= From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 15:43:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 15:43:58 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95348 --- Comment #12 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- > Do you use it? Or do you use any of -fprofile-dir options? Ah, ok, you use it. Based on the report: -fprofile-dir=3Dgcc_prof_dir/%p" So my recommendation would be not to use it and let GCOV run-time library m= erge the profiles. Of course, I'll be interested in `perf report` of such a instrumented run..=