From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 248FB3851C39; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:43:02 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 248FB3851C39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1591818182; bh=52H3/myTiWnESG6SCMW6/1VrQY8HgascmdXfa2zPBKs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Q+vZFTz66JbFj2zNXxPP0FaL+0b/PbjYqicbv0sDqDA5SyryuBwR9mWQjHJzP2tqV Xo8U+K/NkRgM6JJRUSH5EMjha2Tn4oL1Q3fADYy6SXeBHnHZDCocyNjaBx1U5ILjsL ZWLva5q0z1xxPkw+yhiw3STxnsNioctOslHaikqI= From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:43:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:43:02 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95348 --- Comment #30 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- (In reply to Qing Zhao from comment #29) > >=20 > > And you still haven't replied to my essential question: Why can't you m= erge > > profiles into one directory during run? Or at least merge to a reasonab= le > > number of folders that you'll merge later? > Comment #18 has my answer to the above question. The explanation is not sufficient. You mentioned that merging takes 24 hours, so I would expect that directing merging will same you quite some time. Feel free to provide some 'perf report' and I can make some suggestions bas= ed on that. I'm still missing information like: - how long does it take the training run? - how many parallel runs do you have? - what's the average duration of a process?=