From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id C39613894414; Fri, 29 May 2020 15:28:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C39613894414
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1590766105;
 bh=DnwHhtzia2kQHFybsioLcjHNhCUPRVuMoEqHOqrc6FQ=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=tGw+dT+rzf77Zi37YryIZyHOSv+W3WDdfXuawginYYBKYaP6Xil445e6glPHZJQt4
 0Ee7Zf+yzUvXzw6m5JqXP5Qu5FYU3B8Rr1olYH05JBy6W6SVMIiV618U3j00pbFOye
 t2N4pFygeWVG6SrcVBgIMmhKjL+HaJwHkXRNCeHI=
From: "qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in
 the profiling data file, ICC does NOT
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 15:28:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95348-4-O9ywjChXP2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95348-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95348-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 15:28:25 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95348

--- Comment #8 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #6
> Which means one run takes 100MB is size, right? As you mentioned, having
> 1000 .gcda files, it means that one takes 0.1MB?

around 14000 processes, they are not the same executable, so not all the run
take the same size. some bigger, some smaller. the bigger ones take over 10=
0MB.=20

for the bigger one, there are over 5000 .gcda files.=20
> Can you please provide dump of one directory? At least for portion of .gc=
da files?
> How is it common that an entire module is empty?
I will try to get this info for you.=