From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id B8D6B388E83C; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:58:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B8D6B388E83C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1592323084;
 bh=KYlScIOt6F+ZUulwBcN6rHiJCMKmjuDZlkP3LNG2D6E=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=yBbGU+BkMQw76U67ZeTdpC8GREYtHU+75I62yo8XjSv0OTgI9Izy9zx1imwauDN4J
 h0vGdHeipLAP2gRXguiCVl1TEy9dQJTmg86kq0B24Lyr/vKhE8+khDu9pNFkROHPAV
 f9q+kBwy5Cxx0bPkHqGKm/hvozDhfnNl9dpv2LaI=
From: "qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in
 the profiling data file, ICC does NOT
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:58:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95348-4-rcl8C9ACO3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95348-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95348-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:58:04 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95348

--- Comment #39 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #38)
> Created attachment 48738 [details]
> Patch candidate v2
I have added this patch to my private gcc 8 with some change, works fine wi=
th
the small testing case, and fixed the bug I reported in comment #36.=20
>=20
> There's a properly tested patch that supports all operations.
> Please apply also pending patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/548206.html

do I need to apply this as well in order to get the data from the real
application? (note I need to apply the patch to gcc 8, this patch is not ea=
sy
to be applied to gcc 8).=