From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 7FFD139A6890; Fri, 29 May 2020 21:00:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7FFD139A6890
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1590786020;
 bh=gduElbZEMwpQeqf599/FljjcKBSd26Z39T+6WmJpq9k=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=yPZ1bMiT8Bh4rehzcn9E2p1+3JHIBHBB4WpuYXoJqF/lhdLeF7xXoiWzJh1Wai1rX
 aaNapFFPSWikyUOCGHZ+cRNzD5Bw+hg8ril9FXDCzp8J3j2i75MiqT+YW/ezwAmTDk
 M4zcWbeg54pREzvh7LrkcBqgef7SSuS9Ea7a1pQ4=
From: "andrew2085 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/95349] Using std::launder(p) produces unexpected behavior
 where (p) produces expected behavior
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 21:00:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: alias, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: andrew2085 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95349-4-bVDjiB6WqH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95349-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95349-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 21:00:20 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95349

--- Comment #17 from Andrew Downing <andrew2085 at gmail dot com> ---
Also none of the behavior described in p0593 is required for this C++ progr=
am
to be well defined. All objects that are required to exists here are created
explicitly. It's not relying on the implicit creation of any objects. This =
is
valid C++17 code.=