From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id BFBEA386F454; Wed, 27 May 2020 04:50:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BFBEA386F454
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1590555010;
 bh=AR08nULWc6436eMqFpnlpJ4zn1pEAM3QamfEsK9w9pU=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=ZXLZwuSRzYYT5WQkDcerCx2aB/SwzNZA4o2grfFbqfS4m83OISwjQDx73EIqFVUvH
 SrnMWS2wpVi2j2C6+Pr8n4cE/CuYBpx1TsKUCv5j96m+NKZEufnmuQ+KqCFmfvPx5E
 AQfBE87ZBb3nkqMNib7Kpo1Vl3R967J/7uMc9OKI=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/95354] GCC misuse "nonnull-attribute" option and can not
 detect it as UB as well
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 04:50:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-95354-4-UoY5Ylap3Z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95354-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95354-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 04:50:10 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95354

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No,
The place where nonnull attribute is not on the argument itself but rather =
on
the function.

See the document at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-10.1.0/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.ht=
ml#index-nonnull-function-attribute

THIS IS WHY GCC Is warning on that pointer and all.=