From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 885593844035; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 20:01:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 885593844035 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1594843263; bh=Z2Ol4DYC0+umpohqhZJHUJqOXPkfpd8GlJg7n0qCJnU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LO2Cep2vfO0Sgku0NE6cK+y8oMPYaT69FiAovV4JM8n3ySo7/AtOjpuiPFapFDo8k lgO4II39uaZAvDeLSBBkWpE5VZXQWFkjkptT8M/MDc//VAS5sgaiCruKCDClSIiWaH VAmK4rlMQjdFGK6w8utj8cV1Mwfz9k4l7rMLklhw= From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/95355] [11 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: operand size mismatch for `vpmovzxbd' with -masm=intel since r11-485-gf6e40195ec3d3b402a5f6c58dbf359479bc4cbfa Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 20:01:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: assemble-failure X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 20:01:03 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95355 Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|11.0 |10.2 Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #10 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- (In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #5) > Can the bug be marked as resolved? Yes, this particular problem is fixed for gcc-10.2+.=