From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 506DE3987816; Wed, 27 May 2020 15:53:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 506DE3987816
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1590594787;
 bh=zS42tyrVRx6KL58NIp8luF0+KyMvrg6SDvbLws0Doeo=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=Em+gA33LsCGCQ4cPf9SBqRNDtZwQOfabk+QcIxthmKk4M/tk+NXFjr/LCgfakWFrk
 dj2mjnjdrU3+bHcAe0rI0fUkLvLjtCwHfqDQeFgry0vZob8pvC1GEQl1/NqOFvELiQ
 ukgVQBsMKkOc6wd9Hfg+OvflOvwMX55foYx1Qf/8=
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/95360] inconsistent behaviors at -O0
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 15:53:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95360-4-QRjVvjpCY5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95360-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95360-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 15:53:07 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95360

--- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #4)
> So, it seems gdb ignores the "recommended breakpoint location" at 0x4004c=
b,
> because there's an earlier one on the same line at 0x4004bc.
>=20
> The gdb approach is reasonable, but it could do better.
>=20

I found how to disable this behaviour in gdb, and then we do step from line=
 5
to line 6.

Filed gdb PR https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26054 .=