From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2A89F3861031; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 17:38:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2A89F3861031 From: "law at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/95381] [11 Regression]: Bootstrap on m68k fails with ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:867 Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 17:38:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 17:38:28 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95381 --- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law --- On 12/30/20 10:30 AM, glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95381 > > --- Comment #11 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- > (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #10) >> So if that bisection is accurate, the only way this could be failing wou= ld >> be if something with a deprecated attribute is being used. >> >> Maybe some printfs in warn_deprecated_use? But again, I'm a bit surpris= ed >> by the bisection results. > I have verified it. I checked out eede1a6bf3a4f33fa5afef9e4dfc80c4dd89eeb= 3, > reproduced the problem. Then reverted the change and it worked again. > > I honestly don't understand either how that commit could break the build. > >> http://3.14.90.209:8080/job/m68k-linux-gnu/ >> >> Has the most recent build results from my tester. As you can see everyt= hing >> built and regression tested on Dec 9. Dec 15 had a successful bootstrap, >> but glibc failed due to a relatively minor bug in glibc. > Is that a native bootstrap on qemu with "jit" enabled? native bootstrap with qemu.=C2=A0 Don't offhand remember if jit is enabled.= =C2=A0 If not I can probably turn that on for the next one. jeff=