From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 35FEB385782A; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 17:30:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 35FEB385782A
From: "glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/95381] [11 Regression]: Bootstrap on m68k fails with
 ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:867
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 17:30:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95381-4-xoWo6v4sqV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 17:30:35 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95381

--- Comment #11 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-b=
erlin.de> ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #10)
> So if that bisection is accurate, the only way this could be failing would
> be if something with a deprecated attribute is being used.
>=20
> Maybe some printfs in warn_deprecated_use?  But again, I'm a bit surprised
> by the bisection results.

I have verified it. I checked out eede1a6bf3a4f33fa5afef9e4dfc80c4dd89eeb3,
reproduced the problem. Then reverted the change and it worked again.

I honestly don't understand either how that commit could break the build.

> http://3.14.90.209:8080/job/m68k-linux-gnu/
>=20
> Has the most recent build results from my tester.  As you can see everyth=
ing
> built and regression tested on Dec 9.  Dec 15 had a successful bootstrap,
> but glibc failed due to a relatively minor bug in glibc.

Is that a native bootstrap on qemu with "jit" enabled?=