* [Bug c++/95386] internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause
2020-05-28 14:22 [Bug c++/95386] New: internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause jpalecek at web dot de
@ 2020-05-28 14:57 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-28 15:16 ` jpalecek at web dot de
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-28 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed| |2020-05-28
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Was the original code a valid code?
It seems the reduced code is invalid.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/95386] internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause
2020-05-28 14:22 [Bug c++/95386] New: internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause jpalecek at web dot de
2020-05-28 14:57 ` [Bug c++/95386] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-28 15:16 ` jpalecek at web dot de
2020-05-28 15:17 ` jpalecek at web dot de
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jpalecek at web dot de @ 2020-05-28 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386
--- Comment #2 from Jiří Paleček <jpalecek at web dot de> ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Was the original code a valid code?
> It seems the reduced code is invalid.
Yes at least I believe so. I will attach the original code, it is not big.
Note that you must compile (both versions) with -fconcepts.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/95386] internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause
2020-05-28 14:22 [Bug c++/95386] New: internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause jpalecek at web dot de
2020-05-28 14:57 ` [Bug c++/95386] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-28 15:16 ` jpalecek at web dot de
@ 2020-05-28 15:17 ` jpalecek at web dot de
2020-05-28 15:59 ` [Bug c++/95386] [10/11 Regression] ICE: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jpalecek at web dot de @ 2020-05-28 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386
--- Comment #3 from Jiří Paleček <jpalecek at web dot de> ---
Created attachment 48629
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48629&action=edit
Original code which fails to compile
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/95386] [10/11 Regression] ICE: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891
2020-05-28 14:22 [Bug c++/95386] New: internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause jpalecek at web dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-28 15:17 ` jpalecek at web dot de
@ 2020-05-28 15:59 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-29 6:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-28 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[10/11 Regression] ICE: in
|satisfaction_value, while |satisfaction_value, while
|compiling function with a |compiling function with a
|requires clause |requires clause since
| |r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reduced test-case:
$ cat pr95386.ii
namespace std {
template <int __v> struct A {
typedef bool value_type;
constexpr operator value_type() { return __v; }
};
template <typename> struct is_lvalue_reference : A<false> {};
} // namespace std
template <class T> void fn1(T) requires !std::is_lvalue_reference<T>();
template <class T> void fn1(T);
void fn2() { fn1(fn2); }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/95386] [10/11 Regression] ICE: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891
2020-05-28 14:22 [Bug c++/95386] New: internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause jpalecek at web dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-28 15:59 ` [Bug c++/95386] [10/11 Regression] ICE: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-29 6:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-29 7:10 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-29 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |10.2
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Did it work with GCC 9 or why is this marked as regression?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/95386] [10/11 Regression] ICE: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891
2020-05-28 14:22 [Bug c++/95386] New: internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause jpalecek at web dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-29 6:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-29 7:10 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-29 15:07 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-29 7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |9.3.0
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Did it work with GCC 9 or why is this marked as regression?
Yes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/95386] [10/11 Regression] ICE: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891
2020-05-28 14:22 [Bug c++/95386] New: internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause jpalecek at web dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-29 7:10 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-29 15:07 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-30 1:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-29 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/95386] [10/11 Regression] ICE: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891
2020-05-28 14:22 [Bug c++/95386] New: internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause jpalecek at web dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-29 15:07 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-30 1:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-30 4:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-30 4:23 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-30 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aef6e234a8a78db39b4ba034cc4c100c07c294a7
commit r11-738-gaef6e234a8a78db39b4ba034cc4c100c07c294a7
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date: Fri May 29 21:12:21 2020 -0400
c++: satisfaction value of type typedef to bool [PR95386]
In the testcase below, the satisfaction value of fn1<int>'s constraint
is INTEGER_CST '1' of type BOOLEAN_TYPE value_type, which is a typedef
to the standard boolean_type_node. But satisfaction_value expects to
see exactly boolean_true_node or integer_one_node, which this value is
neither, causing us to trip over the assert therein.
This patch changes satisfaction_value to accept INTEGER_CST of any
boolean type.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/95386
* constraint.cc (satisfaction_value): Accept INTEGER_CST of any
boolean type.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/95386
* g++.dg/concepts/pr95386.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/95386] [10/11 Regression] ICE: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891
2020-05-28 14:22 [Bug c++/95386] New: internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause jpalecek at web dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-30 1:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-30 4:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-30 4:23 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-30 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
<ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6632f2920f08f5b45ffd1ada7006d4591ef9b172
commit r10-8215-g6632f2920f08f5b45ffd1ada7006d4591ef9b172
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date: Fri May 29 13:09:20 2020 -0400
c++: satisfaction value of type typedef to bool [PR95386]
In the testcase below, the satisfaction value of fn1<int>'s constraint
is INTEGER_CST '1' of type BOOLEAN_TYPE value_type, which is a typedef
to the standard boolean_type_node. But satisfaction_value expects to
see exactly boolean_true_node or integer_one_node, which this value is
neither, causing us to trip over the assert therein.
This patch relaxes satisfaction_value to accept any INTEGER_CST which
satisfies integer_zerop or integer_onep.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/95386
* constraint.cc (satisfaction_value): Relax to accept any
INTEGER_CST that satisfies integer_zerop or integer_onep.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/95386
* g++.dg/concepts/pr95386.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/95386] [10/11 Regression] ICE: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891
2020-05-28 14:22 [Bug c++/95386] New: internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause jpalecek at web dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-30 4:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-30 4:23 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-30 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for GCC 10.2+.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread