From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id BA73A3861802; Fri,  5 Mar 2021 08:03:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BA73A3861802
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/95401] [10 Regression] GCC produces incorrect
 instruction with -O3 for AVX2 since r10-2257-g868363d4f52df19d
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 08:03:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95401-4-84hDemvvSl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95401-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95401-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 08:03:40 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95401

--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #7)
> How important is it that the test added for this PR be split into two
> separate source files?
>=20
> I ask because, on targets that support vectors, but the vector unit is not
> enabled in the default configuration, vect.exp makes compile the default
> action, instead of run, and with additional sources, compile fails because
> one can't compile multiple sources into a single asm output.

Hmm, but that sounds like a mistake in the dg setup?  Anyway, if you can ma=
ke
the testcase fail when combined (and some noipa attributes sprinkled around)
it's certainly fine to merge it into a single TU.=