From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 1A6323887019; Tue,  2 Jun 2020 07:32:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1A6323887019
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1591083138;
 bh=OlBlpWR78HqqTPSaWtF4as3LfLrQAdqZ+R6r6tpuOSU=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=iFl+M7C3J+VqDMAver6UVRio0W3mi475xfWanvNWx06f8GBABeidIwdDZV9GMgPYK
 HThAmjwfGKQpBrdWmda0l75B085kuzkCua/ihqgCvPQv42Ki9orQxrdsIVZLj6i09P
 G9KOH1OPK4u1WY4ILzKhJQF0ph4vFTwJnN/YCOnw=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/95450] [10/11 regression] Wrong long double folding
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 07:32:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: version target_milestone short_desc keywords
Message-ID: <bug-95450-4-ijAGM4pbGE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 07:32:18 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95450

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|unknown                     |10.1.0
   Target Milestone|---                         |10.2
            Summary|[10 regression] Wrong long  |[10/11 regression] Wrong
                   |double folding              |long double folding
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Does it work with -O0?  I guess that we fold the read from gl_LDBL_MAX
in a "wrong" way, thus native_interpret_expr is maybe wrong?=