From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 205B1385BF9C; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:44:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 205B1385BF9C
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/95451] [8/9/10/11 regression] ICE for lambda capturing this
 and calling operator() since r8-2720-gf44a8dd56f5bfbd0
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:44:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95451-4-kbTWt8Nkmg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95451-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95451-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:44:29 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95451

--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27f9a87886d48448f83e0e559dcf028b1a4a4ec6

commit r11-7418-g27f9a87886d48448f83e0e559dcf028b1a4a4ec6
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Feb 26 10:43:28 2021 +0100

    c++: Fix operator() lookup in lambdas [PR95451]

    During name lookup, name-lookup.c uses:
                if (!(!iter->type && HIDDEN_TYPE_BINDING_P (iter))
                    && (bool (want & LOOK_want::HIDDEN_LAMBDA)
                        || !is_lambda_ignored_entity (iter->value))
                    && qualify_lookup (iter->value, want))
                  binding =3D iter->value;
    Unfortunately as the following testcase shows, this doesn't work in
    generic lambdas, where we on the auto b =3D ... lambda ICE and on the
    auto d =3D lambda reject it even when it should be valid.  The problem
    is that the binding doesn't have a FUNCTION_DECL with
    LAMBDA_FUNCTION_P for the operator(), but an OVERLOAD with
    TEMPLATE_DECL for such FUNCTION_DECL.

    The following patch fixes that in is_lambda_ignored_entity, other
    possibility would be to do that before calling is_lambda_ignored_entity
    in name-lookup.c.

    2021-02-26  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR c++/95451
            * lambda.c (is_lambda_ignored_entity): Before checking for
            LAMBDA_FUNCTION_P, use OVL_FIRST.  Drop FUNCTION_DECL check.

            * g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-95451.C: New test.=