public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
@ 2020-06-01 17:30 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-01 17:30 ` [Bug middle-end/95464] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 more replies)
0 siblings, 16 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-01 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
Bug ID: 95464
Summary: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on
x86_64-linux since r10-6426
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Since r10-6426-g5f0653a8b75a5ad5a5405a27dd92d3a5759eed4c we on x86_64-linux
miscompile following testcase at -O2:
struct S { unsigned a:1, b:1, c:1, d:1, e:14, f:14; };
__attribute__((noipa)) int
foo (struct S x)
{
if (x.a != 0 || x.b != 1 || x.c != 0 || x.d != 1
|| x.e != 7239 || x.f != 6474)
__builtin_abort ();
}
__attribute__((noipa)) void
bar (struct S x, struct S y)
{
if (x.a != 0 || x.b != 1 || x.c != 0 || x.d != 1
|| x.e != 7239 || x.f != 6474)
__builtin_abort ();
if (y.a != 0 || y.b != 1 || y.c != 1 || y.d != 1
|| y.e != 16320 || y.f != 7315)
__builtin_abort ();
}
__attribute__((noipa)) void
baz (struct S x)
{
if (x.a != 1 || x.b != 1 || x.c != 1 || x.d != 1
|| x.e != 16320 || x.f != 7315)
__builtin_abort ();
}
__attribute__((noipa)) void
qux (struct S x, struct S y, unsigned z)
{
struct S a = x, b;
for (unsigned i = 0; i < z; ++i)
foo (x);
if (x.a && x.e == 16)
a.e = 32;
b = a;
b.c = y.c;
b.e = y.e;
b.f = y.f;
bar (a, b);
a = b;
__asm volatile ("" : : : "ax", "bx", "cx", "dx", "si", "di",
#ifdef __OPTIMIZE__
"bp",
#endif
"r8", "r9", "r10", "r11", "r12", "r13", "r14",
"r15");
a.a = 1;
a.c = 1;
baz (a);
}
int
main ()
{
struct S x = { 0, 1, 0, 1, 7239, 6474 };
struct S y = { 1, 0, 1, 0, 16320, 7315 };
qux (x, y, 1);
return 0;
}
(in original source obviously there was no inline asm, but instead the function
was large enough that the variable got spilled).
I believe this is a RA bug though. In *.ira we have:
(insn 67 66 68 3 (parallel [
(set (strict_low_part (subreg:QI (reg/v:SI 94 [ a ]) 0))
(ior:QI (subreg:QI (reg/v:SI 94 [ a ]) 0)
(const_int 5 [0x5])))
(clobber (reg:CC 17 flags))
]) "gallivm2.c":51:3 492 {*iorqi_1_slp}
(expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 17 flags)
(nil)))
(insn 68 67 69 3 (set (reg:SI 5 di)
(reg/v:SI 94 [ a ])) "gallivm2.c":51:3 67 {*movsi_internal}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/v:SI 94 [ a ])
(nil)))
which looks good to me, the strict_low_part in there says that the low 8 bits
of pseudo 94 are ored with 5 and the upper 24 bits stay as is (so, in the end
it is the same as SImode |= 5, not really sure why we ended up with that, e.g.
if the loop calling foo is changed into a single call to foo, it doesn't
happen).
But LRA changes this into:
(insn 120 66 67 3 (set (reg:QI 0 ax [137])
(mem/c:QI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 7 sp)
(const_int 8 [0x8])) [4 %sfp+-8 S1 A32])) "gallivm2.c":51:3 69
{*movqi_internal}
(nil))
(insn 67 120 121 3 (parallel [
(set (strict_low_part (reg:QI 0 ax [137]))
(ior:QI (reg:QI 0 ax [137])
(const_int 5 [0x5])))
(clobber (reg:CC 17 flags))
]) "gallivm2.c":51:3 492 {*iorqi_1_slp}
(nil))
(insn 121 67 122 3 (set (reg:QI 5 di [orig:94 a ] [94])
(reg:QI 0 ax [137])) "gallivm2.c":51:3 69 {*movqi_internal}
(nil))
which is not equivalent, because it makes the upper 24 bits undefined instead
of loaded from the spill slot.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-01 17:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-01 20:11 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-01 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2020-06-01
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |ra, wrong-code
CC| |vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|--- |10.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-01 17:30 ` [Bug middle-end/95464] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-01 20:11 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-02 7:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-01 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Jakub, thank you for working on the PR and providing the test case.
It seems to me that the problem occurs in inheritance sub-pass of LRA. It is a
very complicated sub-pass. Making a fix and testing it can take a few days.
But I hope to fix the PR on this week.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-01 17:30 ` [Bug middle-end/95464] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-01 20:11 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-02 7:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-02 8:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-02 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I wonder where we'd simplify things like
(insn 67 66 68 3 (parallel [
(set (strict_low_part (subreg:QI (reg/v:SI 94 [ a ]) 0))
(ior:QI (subreg:QI (reg/v:SI 94 [ a ]) 0)
(const_int 5 [0x5])))
(clobber (reg:CC 17 flags))
]) "gallivm2.c":51:3 492 {*iorqi_1_slp}
(expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 17 flags)
(nil)))
I guess simplify_rtx would just see the SET_SRC? The above might appear
quite frequently from bit fiddling RTL expansion I guess.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-02 7:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-02 8:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-04 16:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-02 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Perhaps define_split? For xor and and too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-02 8:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-04 16:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-04 17:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-04 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5261cf8ce824bfc75eb6f12ad5e3716c085b6f9a
commit r11-937-g5261cf8ce824bfc75eb6f12ad5e3716c085b6f9a
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jun 4 12:04:48 2020 -0400
Add processing STRICT_LOW_PART for matched reloads.
2020-06-04 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR middle-end/95464
* lra.c (lra_emit_move): Add processing STRICT_LOW_PART.
* lra-constraints.c (match_reload): Use STRICT_LOW_PART in output
reload if the original insn has it too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-04 16:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-04 17:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-04 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e7ef9a40cd0c688cd331bc26224d1fbe360c1fe6
commit r11-951-ge7ef9a40cd0c688cd331bc26224d1fbe360c1fe6
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jun 4 13:32:24 2020 -0400
Add test for PR95464.c.
2020-06-04 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR middle-end/95464
* gcc.target/i386/pr95464.c: New.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-04 17:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-25 7:52 ` [Bug middle-end/95464] [10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-23 6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.2 |10.3
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.2 is released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-09-25 7:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-25 15:03 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-25 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[10/11 Regression] |[10 Regression]
|Miscompilation of mesa on |Miscompilation of mesa on
|x86_64-linux since r10-6426 |x86_64-linux since r10-6426
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Vlad, do you plan to backport this to 10.3?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-25 7:52 ` [Bug middle-end/95464] [10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-09-25 15:03 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-25 16:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-25 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Vlad, do you plan to backport this to 10.3?
I guess so. We had enough time to test it. I don't see any complaints about
this patch. I'll backport it today into release/gcc-10 branch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-25 15:03 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-09-25 16:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-25 16:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-25 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov
<vmakarov@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:038b65f378b36624b1fd3867fa5e578c1bfa50cc
commit r10-8799-g038b65f378b36624b1fd3867fa5e578c1bfa50cc
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jun 4 12:04:48 2020 -0400
Add processing STRICT_LOW_PART for matched reloads.
2020-06-04 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR middle-end/95464
* lra.c (lra_emit_move): Add processing STRICT_LOW_PART.
* lra-constraints.c (match_reload): Use STRICT_LOW_PART in output
reload if the original insn has it too.
(cherry picked from commit 5261cf8ce824bfc75eb6f12ad5e3716c085b6f9a)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-25 16:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-09-25 16:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-09 14:20 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-25 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov
<vmakarov@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:957e37ac288fe6c40ee0bb98a0b06a85be8a35e3
commit r10-8800-g957e37ac288fe6c40ee0bb98a0b06a85be8a35e3
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jun 4 13:32:24 2020 -0400
Add test for PR95464.c.
2020-06-04 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR middle-end/95464
* gcc.target/i386/pr95464.c: New.
(cherry picked from commit e7ef9a40cd0c688cd331bc26224d1fbe360c1fe6)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-25 16:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-09 14:20 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-09 14:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-09 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Vlad, do you plan to backport this to 10.3?
Unfortunately, a few days ago people reported a serious problem with the patch
(see PR97313). I've just submitted a patch fixing the new problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=bb37ad8cc0fc937c7afcdab471e5d65d176041c3
I believe this new patch should be also cherry-picked to gcc-10 branch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-09 14:20 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-09 14:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-09 14:57 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-09 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Certainly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-09 14:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-09 14:57 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-12 7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-09 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> Certainly.
I've just committed it into the branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70a66ff0228277b4dd89263a663c0a87eb5d782f
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-09 14:57 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-12 7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-08 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.3 |10.4
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95464] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-12 7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-12 7:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |10.2.0
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.3
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-12 7:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-01 17:30 [Bug middle-end/95464] New: [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-01 17:30 ` [Bug middle-end/95464] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-01 20:11 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-02 7:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-02 8:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-04 16:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-04 17:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-25 7:52 ` [Bug middle-end/95464] [10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-25 15:03 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-25 16:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-25 16:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-09 14:20 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-09 14:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-09 14:57 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-12 7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).