From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6AFBF386F809; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 08:32:48 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6AFBF386F809 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1591173168; bh=jmo+loGoxaxr/QnOqHEdN9frfi6WtRnretS6x5BqIz8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fA6I7ITjPXVxTBXMn+dah5nyXYS4Uwut4xmi+mw11LtHSTUGCAyGvWJr+CqLAK4Dy kIPLPv6ErZBXRNiG8tlRcEmfi1UMuYfwSH40s+2WNs7xbsgMXN/Oy0uxfIgeDl3Hei jp+K0FsvvwQPuLi8eJnNxRzHZSXBtqLB/fGEuU9A= From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/95477] [coroutines] coroutine result object not properly freed Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 08:32:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status target_milestone keywords everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 08:32:48 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95477 Iain Sandoe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2020-06-03 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target Milestone|--- |10.2 Keywords| |wrong-code Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe --- thanks for the report it looks like I omitted a cleanup expression.=