From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 22C243860017; Wed,  3 Jun 2020 06:22:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 22C243860017
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1591165366;
 bh=g6EnCGh9r1vbly6DuHVJ2pTxDVAu0kZ6RHXdoTmE5bg=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=lxvsPXhGrYG/YzjO1n8BBsYNiPWvTw8RWToT+4CpVDJeY6EGb6qrqAD+zk3GyZHID
 DPQ3jrz8d4z9eUA58S/eWZfKTSpctIXFmqasNowj+dqnF75Kozx4hZZWyWUtTa2qVX
 qj0Yk57Oo2rl7DmtF/ZUSt5JFw9+U92g/vNk8ayc=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/95487] [10/11 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple
 failed (error: invalid vector types in nop conversion) with -O3
 -march=skylake-avx512 since r10-1052-gc29c92c789d93848
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 06:22:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget target_milestone cc
Message-ID: <bug-95487-4-pFZ8zeKzvv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95487-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95487-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 06:22:46 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95487

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|                            |x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
   Target Milestone|---                         |10.2
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So the issue is in the scatter store the mask is vectorized with V32QImode
but we expect a vector boolean (it seems).  And we run into

             if (TYPE_MODE (masktype) =3D=3D TYPE_MODE (optype))
                utype =3D masktype;
              else
                utype =3D lang_hooks.types.type_for_mode (TYPE_MODE (optype=
), 1);

with maskype QImode and optype V32QImode.  utype is V32QImode as well after
the above and then with masktype still QImode we do

              if (!useless_type_conversion_p (masktype, utype))
                {
                  gcc_assert (TYPE_PRECISION (utype)
                              <=3D TYPE_PRECISION (masktype));
                  var =3D vect_get_new_ssa_name (masktype, vect_scalar_var);
                  new_stmt =3D gimple_build_assign (var, NOP_EXPR, mask_arg=
);
                  vect_finish_stmt_generation (vinfo, stmt_info, new_stmt,
gsi);
                  mask_arg =3D var;

and emit the bogus NOP_EXPR trying to convert from V32QImode to QImode.  Oo=
ps?

Jakub, you added the scatter support - do you remember what the code tries =
to
do here?=