From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id E35B23851C17; Sat,  6 Jun 2020 20:42:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E35B23851C17
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1591476133;
 bh=nXzOakGyE57IOFVLJ501A45foz4jsPt+nQ8VSIkO6xc=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=KsDCiQv+94HQxabQNqx4QjzHQ42VMEgGaXptTnPtjhCcpIxyeNw8zQ4Wop+s9CKZA
 7zOSHn9lQiodANLq1ERUkMP0qRXRycLzJniCmSb0sACsR1cz98gVL4eCicdM6XCRq7
 Vw/X3mEBJ5psTAjFrL5DBl6MhKobzTTLTTE6bdjU=
From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/95512] gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:1066: array sanity
 check after use
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 20:42:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-95512-4-6s6Rr6Cm9Y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95512-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95512-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 20:42:14 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95512

--- Comment #4 from David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> I didn't write the code, but for more context:

Thanks for the extra context.

> Maybe it is bad style, but I still consider it a false positive.

If you go back and check what cppcheck is saying, it is merely
mentioning what it thinks is bad style.

> cppcheck's view is probably too narrow to understand the range of dim.

Agreed. AFAIK cppcheck merely searches and reports
on source code patterns like

  if (arrayName[ X] && X < someExpression)

Whether you want to keep the code in bad style is up to you.
I did originally suggest some code that looked IMHO to be better style.=