From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E5CE6385BF81; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 21:24:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E5CE6385BF81 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1591392287; bh=/QFpR2orSnAXg4+r48+JCUQsy3QowtvbSeWfbKw8/1c=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=a6/q9MEshnxK2JPq+CgAGR8I+KYjk9EDoDpO3+ag3d8wnHUs2oNwZvVJsjP9S7/6m 1UnxarzXXZa3fOIv5SA2CdJfte1eoh4GJEPvSjG+mwtSXU0CQm0GpFDp1iUvP8A492 Ees3dzJV0+5DR1aKttp37s30eExJzpznUE41HMgE= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/95512] gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:1066: array sanity check after use Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 21:24:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 21:24:48 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95512 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2020-06-05 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- This looks like a false positive: dim is the index of the enclosing for loo= p. It is also funny that it warns about this statement and not the if preceedi= ng this one.=