From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 354D13840C05; Thu,  4 Jun 2020 19:22:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 354D13840C05
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1591298541;
 bh=v+SOB3XcK6G50Q0m9A7qNPEj3n7pGdibIhU3b0e2kXY=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=S/vPhqS35QdQQ4aQ/nVXd/UeXsWrEFGF6TUFIP6ryS6F++MTYlO1F6xUSs4S3ItL4
 PTJFMtsjwIFKL3GkpkM23NoZREqvIhk83ZR4b0DfwfO5gDjdewESptK9seDy4L01UY
 RWasw7uSduXcIMADvK2WHFnGjYEf1Nh/IFZVHumw=
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/95517] [coroutines] suggested warning when co_return and
 return_void() are missing
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 19:22:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed target_milestone cf_reconfirmed_on
 bug_severity assigned_to bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-95517-4-FKCMMvhvB9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 19:22:21 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95517

Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Target Milestone|---                         |11.0
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-06-04
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |iains at gcc dot gn=
u.org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Generally, it's not required to diagnose UB, however I think we can do bett=
er
with the co_return/return stuff and have some ideas in mind already. So, yes
this a good idea,=