From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6A137388E83F; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:57:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6A137388E83F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1591279065; bh=qr6Qzhykres9TkHkf12toVetLx0bTUvjY2kzYMKA8uM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cTG+/58ug3n2bWCMYT4uQkWqJMdJwgg3ZczWT1xIPRP6lQjmZISXHScZgRcsCIc6H qdFECN018KJC1HS/S3yhrRciGxiXkhFsHAr3I7hN8i+jtwYualteAJ8eIb8goUGoak HuHMGvw2CL+4a717Zn/d/uJrfXJAZo/QJMrNBwZo= From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug jit/95521] libgccjit.so: error: in build2, at tree.c:4743 Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 13:57:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: jit X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 13:57:45 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95521 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > >libgccjit.so: error: in build2, at tree.c:4743 >=20 > This means the PLUS_EXPR is being used when adding a pointer and an integ= er > together. It needs to be POINTER_PLUS_EXPR. >=20 > This does not mean the bug is not in the JIT library but it might mean a = bug > in your code. A goal of libgccjit is that it shouldn't be possible to generate an ICE by making API calls; so this seems like a violation of that; we either need stronger type-checking at the API boundary, or to be smarter about how we m= ake our trees.=