public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/95540] [coroutine] coroutine_traits<> lookup for lambdas
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 19:19:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-95540-4-Pp2S3QshwV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-95540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95540

--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Michael Bruck from comment #5)
> > Since the coroutine traits are global, and the closure type is unique,
> > that provides a way to disambiguate instantiations of the traits for
> > lambdas with otherwise identical signatures.
> 
> But the closure type is generated in the same lambda expression where the
> coroutine generator looks up the coroutine_traits<>. How do I specialize on
> that?

I wasn't meaning to suggest you can specialise per lambda (but I was saying
that the traits instantiated will be unique per lambda) - perhaps the latter is
an implementation detail.

Providing the class/callable object type to the traits look does allow
specialisations like ...

template<typename R, typename CallOp, typename ...T>
struct std::coroutine_traits<R, CallOp, T...> {
    struct promise_type {
        promise_type (CallOp op, T ...args) {}
        Fake get_return_object() { return {}; }
        std::suspend_always initial_suspend() { return {}; }
....

to be possible.
( I might be getting out of my depth with the long history of the design
evolution here - but this is my understanding of the rationale for the status
quo ).

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-05 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-04 17:03 [Bug c++/95540] New: " bruck.michael at gmail dot com
2020-06-04 17:24 ` [Bug c++/95540] " bruck.michael at gmail dot com
2020-06-05  7:32 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-05 15:38 ` bruck.michael at gmail dot com
2020-06-05 15:54 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-05 18:52 ` bruck.michael at gmail dot com
2020-06-05 19:19 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-06-11  0:17 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-11  7:40 ` bruck.michael at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-95540-4-Pp2S3QshwV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).