public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/95540] [coroutine] coroutine_traits<> lookup for lambdas
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 19:19:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-95540-4-Pp2S3QshwV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-95540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95540
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Michael Bruck from comment #5)
> > Since the coroutine traits are global, and the closure type is unique,
> > that provides a way to disambiguate instantiations of the traits for
> > lambdas with otherwise identical signatures.
>
> But the closure type is generated in the same lambda expression where the
> coroutine generator looks up the coroutine_traits<>. How do I specialize on
> that?
I wasn't meaning to suggest you can specialise per lambda (but I was saying
that the traits instantiated will be unique per lambda) - perhaps the latter is
an implementation detail.
Providing the class/callable object type to the traits look does allow
specialisations like ...
template<typename R, typename CallOp, typename ...T>
struct std::coroutine_traits<R, CallOp, T...> {
struct promise_type {
promise_type (CallOp op, T ...args) {}
Fake get_return_object() { return {}; }
std::suspend_always initial_suspend() { return {}; }
....
to be possible.
( I might be getting out of my depth with the long history of the design
evolution here - but this is my understanding of the rationale for the status
quo ).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-05 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-04 17:03 [Bug c++/95540] New: " bruck.michael at gmail dot com
2020-06-04 17:24 ` [Bug c++/95540] " bruck.michael at gmail dot com
2020-06-05 7:32 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-05 15:38 ` bruck.michael at gmail dot com
2020-06-05 15:54 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-05 18:52 ` bruck.michael at gmail dot com
2020-06-05 19:19 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-06-11 0:17 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-11 7:40 ` bruck.michael at gmail dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-95540-4-Pp2S3QshwV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).