public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/95562] [10/11 Regression] ICE when using noexcept depending on boolean template parameter since r10-1280-g78f7607db4c53f8c Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:33:57 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-95562-4-zZkhKzHev9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-95562-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95562 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek <mpolacek@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:977a173c196dc5ba5ac2e1b890083beb0451cf60 commit r10-8268-g977a173c196dc5ba5ac2e1b890083beb0451cf60 Author: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> Date: Wed Jun 10 10:49:08 2020 -0400 c++: Fix ICE with delayed parsing of noexcept-specifier [PR95562] Here we ICE because a DEFERRED_PARSE expression leaked to tsubst_copy. We create these expressions for deferred noexcept-specifiers in cp_parser_save_noexcept; they are supposed to be re-parsed in cp_parser_late_noexcept_specifier. In this case we never got around to re-parsing it because the noexcept-specifier was attached to a pointer to a function, not to a function declaration. But we should not have delayed the parsing here in the first place; we already avoid delaying the parsing for alias-decls, typedefs, and friend function declarations. (Clang++ also doesn't delay the parsing for pointers to function.) gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR c++/95562 * parser.c (cp_parser_direct_declarator): Clear CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT if the declarator kind is not cdk_id. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c++/95562 * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept60.C: New test.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-10 15:33 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-06-06 13:19 [Bug c++/95562] New: ICE when using noexcept depending on boolean template parameter philipp.koegel at mailbox dot org 2020-06-09 11:28 ` [Bug c++/95562] [10/11 Regression] ICE when using noexcept depending on boolean template parameter since r10-1280-g78f7607db4c53f8c marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-06-09 13:21 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-06-09 22:05 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-06-10 13:36 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-06-10 15:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2020-06-10 15:34 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-06-15 16:19 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-95562-4-zZkhKzHev9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).